CSIS Condones Sexual Assaults on its Canadian Citizens and Attacks on its own Civilian Population

The first case involves the sexual assault of a child purported to be fathered by a high-level ex drug trafficker, in which the child was injected with needles in his genital area- Only to find out it is not his child, but a senior police officers child, acting like his child for an investigation. CSIS orchestrated operation- CSIS spokesperson said “no comment’

The second case involves, injecting its Canadian citizens with a metallic substrate which is conductive to electrical stimulation. CSIS orchestrated operation- CSIS spokesperson said “no comment’

The third case involves, using clandestine monitoring techniques to overtly and covertly implant listening devices into its Canadian citizens infringing the presumed innocent citizens fundamental rights CSIS spokesperson said “no comment’

What has transpired is a government agency which has condoned various clandestine techniques which infringed the majority of the fundamental freedoms that are enshrined in the Canadian constitution. After investigating and implanting listening devices to record suspects purported involved in various illegal and nefarious activities, the CSIS representative who implanted and injected a significant proportion of its Canadian citizens was able to obtain very secretive information or intelligence.

The highly classified information and intelligence consisted of flatulation noises, burps, muted and distorted sounds, along with no information corroborated in its recording of its subjects, in fact, the useless recordings consisted of basically sounds which have no credible use to the intelligence agency. Listen to the unsealed in Superior Court of Ontario's recordings of the subject of a subject during a criminal investigation by the CSIS intelligence agency. This has been characterized as the most costly and ineffective monitoring investigation in Canadian history, whereby children were sexually assaulted, senior citizens were attacked and the government's expenditures exceeded $410 million dollars (commissioning drivers in vehicles to drive around and bilk the EI system for 2 years at $2100 per month, once commissioned).

The sexual assaults of various children, orchestrated by the CSIS Intelligence agency and its associates and useless waste of expenditures has been viewed as an embarrassment to the federal agency. An informant also indicates, after monitoring, recording several high-level drug traffickers in the past, the federal agency was unable to protect 83x civilians who were massacred on the various operating tables, along with a significant proportion of its citizens being injected and amputated throughout the 7 years.

"the federal agency was unable to protect 83x civilians who were massacred on the various operating tables, along with a significant proportion of its citizens being injected and amputated throughout the 7 years"

In one case, a cousin of a high-ranking CSIS intelligence agency was tricked into removing all of her teeth in Niagara Falls, Ontario. In another case, a relative of another CSIS high ranking official was injected with a metallic substrate resulting in their heads to expand in size, etc. It has also been rumored that the CSIS agency only hires within, meaning that they have infringed the rights of most Canadians by undertaking needless and unnecessary operations on its subjects, while ignoring the domestic terrorist threats from within their own ranks, respectively.

In another case informants have indicated that the agency is viewed as being a useless agency in which actual intelligence agency will not information share to its Canadian intelligence community. The hand signs and overt gestures were even being laughed at by the actual intelligence agency. For example, one of the hand gestures taught by the CSIS intelligence agents is the use of both hands on the collar to signify a certain observational check, however the use of both hands during an operational check is questioned due to the fact that all hands must be free to engage a hostile, along with having their hands free to discharge a firearms if an immediate threat is imposed, etc.

For example, one of the hand gestures taught by the CSIS intelligence agents is to place both hands on the collar to signify a certain observational check, however the use of both hands during an operational check is questioned due to the fact that all hands must be free to engage a hostile, along with having their hands free to discharge a firearm if an immediate threat is imposed, etc

The operational check deployed which was taught by its counterpart spy agency to the South, wasn't even an actual technique, it was conjured by a civilian police officer now commissioned as a police officer who has been characterized as 'watching and creating too many movies"

CSIS intelligence agency, along with its clandestine monitoring techniques on its private citizens and inability to protect its own citizens (including high-ranking CSIS officials own relatives) is an embarrassment for the administration of justice, along with the department of Justice.

The useless and unnecessary monitoring of individuals who have not undertaken criminal activities and the unrealistic, conjured and fictious view of criminal activities from its own citizens is an embarrassment to the federal agency itself. The ignorance towards its own agents undertaking domestic related terrorism offenses currently being investigated by the Central Intelligence Agency (akamai in Virginia) and the MI5 in the United Kingdom, along with its agents being investigated for domestic terrorism related offenses has resulted in ‘actual’ intelligence agencies ignoring request for information/ intelligence sharing, along with ignoring requests for international cooperation’s, etc. The briefing note concludes that some kind of policy change needs to be made — although the intelligence agency's recommendations are also redacted.

"As an example of the challenge, absent a statutory regime that facilitates the simultaneous use and protection of sensitive information in Federal Court reviews of decisions to deny foreign investment on national security grounds under the Investment Canada Act, the government will not be able to confidently rely on intelligence when acting to counter economic-based threats," the note reads.

"Additionally, reform measures may help protect against a growing trend being employed by defendants and their counsel of seeking disclosure of intelligence that may have informed a criminal investigation and subsequent prosecution."

But coming up with a policy hasn't been easy for successive governments, dating back to the Air India inquiry.

"This is a really hard problem. If it was an easy problem with an easy solution, we'd probably have the solution," said Nesbitt. 

CSIS and the RCMP say they've already taken steps to better communicate with other early on in a court proceeding — something both West and Nesbitt said they welcome. 

But changes also should be made to the dual-track court system used to deal with intelligence issues, they said.

Right now, criminal cases involving intelligence go to separate hearings in Federal Court where a judge, with help from a special adviser, decides what should be protected under the Canada Evidence Act and held back from disclosure in open court.

The process can slow down an already sluggish trial process — but it's a key aspect of a defendant's right to a fair trial.

That process is playing out now in the case against Cameron Orts, the RCMP official accused of leaking operational information, and preparing to leak even more, to a foreign power or terrorist group. West said changes could be made to streamline the process.

"It makes things very cumbersome, makes things very clunky, and allows the defense to use a variety of kind of procedural tactics to delay prosecution and in some cases avoid prosecution," she said. 

"I think we need to streamline the legislation so that defense lawyers can't be playing these games to basically force the Crown to choose between revealing all of the information necessary for proceeding with the prosecution."

Ian McLeod, a spokesperson for the Department of Justice, said it would be inappropriate to speculate or comment on any specific potential legislative reforms.

In an effort to deal with the issue, the RCMP said it commissioned a review of how its national security program operates.

"These reviews identified that there was much that could be done operationally to help address intelligence as evidence challenges, such as, but not limited to: new policies to improve how intelligence is handled; improving training; and more effectively leveraging existing mechanisms to protect intelligence such as the Canada Evidence Act," said spokesperson Robin Percival.

"Efforts to implement these operational improvements are underway."

Nesbitt said the government's promise to appoint a new director of terrorism prosecutions looks promising, although it's not clear when that office will be up and running.

"It's a little bit unclear what that would mean or where that stands, given the pandemic has arisen since that announcement. But that might be another thing where you get sort of specialized legal training and that could create cultural shifts," he said.

The last public mandate letters to Public Safety Minister Bill Blair and Justice Minister David Lametti (new ones are expected to be made public soon) ask both ministers to "coordinate efforts to prosecute terror suspects to the fullest extent of the law" and create a new office of the Director of Terrorism Prosecutions.

"This work is ongoing," said Mary-Liz Power, a spokesperson for Blair.

"It is critical we address the intelligence to evidence challenges that face us today to support the successful prosecution of those individuals who have committed criminal acts, both in Canada and abroad."